.

President Donald Trump is embracing his reputation as a dealmaker, claiming in a statement Monday that he had already ended six wars so far in his second term. Speaking at the White House with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a group of European leaders, Trump also promised “significant progress” in the coming days toward ending the war in Ukraine.

“I’ve done six wars — I’ve ended six wars,” Trump said. “Look, India-Pakistan, we’re talking about big places. You just take a look at some of these wars. You go to Africa and take a look at them.”

Trump’s claims have been promoted in recent weeks by the White House as part of his record as the “President of Peace.” An earlier statement, released on the 76th anniversary of the United Nations, claimed to have “advanced peace deals” on “many fronts” and noted accomplishments in several regions of the world: Armenia and Azerbaijan, Cambodia and Thailand, Israel and Iran, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Egypt and Ethiopia, and Serbia and Kosovo. Trump administration officials have also pointed to the Abraham Accords he brokered during his first term normalizing relations between Israel and several Arab states.

A False or Precarious Peace?

Analysts have questioned whether Trump’s promises are real or if he is merely branding ceasefires as historic peace treaties. In the case of Israel and Iran, a truce was declared to end a 12-day flare-up, but core tensions over Tehran’s nuclear program have not been resolved.

His record for past peace deals is also telling of the limits of the Trump model. Trump interventions to stop violence between Israel and Hamas ultimately failed, while first-term summits with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un collapsed, leaving Pyongyang with an arsenal that has grown even larger since 2018.

Trump has still had some symbolic successes. Earlier this month, Armenia and Azerbaijan agreed in a White House-signed declaration to recognize each other’s borders and renounce violence, and pledged to reopen transport links to each other. As part of the deal, the countries accepted a U.S.-backed transportation corridor through Armenia called the “Trump Route for Peace and Prosperity.” Azerbaijan President Ilham Aliyev hailed the deal as “a miracle.” Analysts say that the hard-fought territorial disputes between the countries remain to be resolved.

Pressure Tactics

Trump’s efforts in Southeast Asia reflected the use of his economic leverage to force a stop to violence. After clashes between Cambodia and Thailand over a disputed border area killed 38 people, he threatened to suspend trade deals with both governments unless they ended the conflict. The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) helped finalize the arrangement, but Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet nonetheless awarded Trump a copy of the Nobel Peace Prize nomination for his “extraordinary statesmanship.”

A similar move occurred in May with a border flare-up between India and Pakistan, another Trump intervention in a territorial dispute. Pakistan welcomed Washington’s role in de-escalating the conflict. India, however, downplayed the importance of the U.S. and said that the ceasefire was the result of its own military efforts. The truce remains fragile, with the decades-long dispute over Kashmir unresolved and liable to break out again.

He has also taken credit for steps in Africa between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. A deal they reached called for them to respect each other’s borders and disarm militias. However, the deal was rejected by the M23 rebel group. Analysts also see a U.S. strategic calculation in bolstering a friendly government in Congo that would help it compete with China for the continent’s mineral resources.

His claims on Egypt and Ethiopia have involved a bitter impasse over an enormous dam project on the Nile. Trump has urged compromise, but no binding deal has been struck. In a similar case, the Trump administration has pointed to recent normalization measures between Serbia and Kosovo that date to Trump’s first term. The two countries remain at odds, however, with recent talks only a result of EU efforts.

His unconventional diplomatic approach has included big announcements, personal branding of diplomatic victories, and rhetoric that often de-emphasizes nuanced negotiations, and has so far produced mixed results. Some critics have pointed to the Trump’s downsizing of the State Department and cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development as undercutting America’s ability to use short-term deals to bring lasting peace.

Others, though, note that Trump’s interventions can be a surprisingly effective lever. Celeste Wallander, a former assistant secretary of defense now at the Center for a New American Security, told NPR that Trump’s handling of rising India-Pakistan tensions “was done in a professional way, quietly, diplomatically, and with some real finesse finding common ground between the parties.”

As Trump now attempts to turn his attention to Ukraine, the key question is whether his past record is one of durable diplomacy or merely temporary fixes. So far, his record shows both: headline-grabbing deals that don’t result in permanent peace alongside a number of cases where U.S. pressure has at least been able to stop a conflict from getting worse. How long these will last is an open question.